How does Carnegie publicly respond to Frick's handling of the strike?

• A. He defends Frick's actions
• B. He states he would have managed it differently
• C. He remains silent
• D. He supports a violent response

Answer: (B)

Carnegie's public response to Frick's handling of the strike illustrates his more diplomatic approach compared to Frick's aggressive tactics. By stating that he would have managed the situation differently, Carnegie distances himself from the violent and confrontational methods employed by his partner. This response aligns with Carnegie's vision of industrial relations, where he believed in the importance of worker relations and negotiations, rather than intimidation and force. Although he was committed to maintaining profitability and protecting his business interests, this statement reflects Carnegie's awareness of the potential long-term implications of Labor Relations on public perception and company reputation.

In contrast, the other options depict responses that do not accurately reflect Carnegie's nuanced stance. Defending Frick's actions would imply an endorsement of the violence that occurred, while remaining silent would not engage with the public fallout of the strike at all. Supporting a violent response is contrary to Carnegie's broader philosophy, which emphasized the value of cooperation and progress through peaceful means in the industrial sphere.